1 - Lung cancer and smokers: When most smokers began to smoke filtered cigarettes
Lung cancer among non-smokers has been increasing
while those among smokers has been decreasing. Possibly because of filters which nearly every study consistently shows decreases the
risk by as much as 20 to 30 percent.
Study in tobacco related cancers 1982 - 1985.
Funded by: National cancer institute (NCI)
(of the department of health and human services) Apparently this government institution didn't get the memo?
Ever hear of this on
the MSM? That's a joke
2 - Asbestos and smoking:
Smoking has a protective effect on immunological abnormalities in asbestos workers.
Ever hear of this study? Not a chance
Institute of immunology and experimental therapy, (Poland)
3 - Asbestos and cancer
Relative risks
of lung cancer for asbestos workers was highest for those who had never smoked, lowest for current smokers, and intermediate for ex-smokers.
The trend was statistically significant. There was no significant association between smoking and death from mesothelioma.
Perhaps
the scientists that did this study never got the memo from Big Anti-Tobacco money?
University of London school of hygiene and tropical
medicine.
4 - Lung volume
Lung volume perimeters were found to decrease with age, but there was no significant modification related to tobacco
consumption. OOPS
Institute d' Etudes et Recherches Pneumophtisiologiques (Institute of studies on tuberculosis, France)
5 - Bronchial
Neither
smokers nor nonsmokers showed any change in bronchial responsiveness after smoking cigarettes.
Yokohama City University school of medicine
(Japan).
6 - Coronary heart disease (CHD)
No statistically significant association was found in either community between smoking and
coronary heart disease, hypertension or somatic complaints.
University of Texas, school of Allied health science.
7 - Second hand smoke (SHS) or if you prefer, External Tobacco Smoke (ETS)
No difference in prevalence of cardiovascular symptoms was
found between those living with smokers and those not.
West of Scotland cancer surveillance unit, Ruchill hospital.
8 - Ovarian and
breast cancer
Overall, smoking was not found to be associated with any of the cancers studied.
Centers for disease control and
prevention (CDC), epidemiologic studies branch, Division of reproductive health.
Our own government again apparently didn't get the
memo?
9 - Breast cancer
The risk of breast cancer does not appear to be influenced by cigarette smoking:
Boston university medical center,
Drug epidemiology unit.
10 - External tobacco smoke (ETS) effect on children
No convincing difference for viral infections or respiratory
illness were seen with parental smoking as an isolated factor.
Baylor college of medicine, Influenza research center, (Texas).
The list could go on and on for dozens of pages
Could any informed person think that any of the countless studies would ever see the
light of day in the US news media? Unfortunately, many people today believe that if it's not on the major news or comes from an authority
figure, it's not likely to be true or paid attention to. That's how those in control stay in control. The bigger the lie, often, the
more people will believe it particularly if that's all they hear year after year.