Fat-free skim milk is the quintessential staple of any health-conscious home in America. You're supposed to drink skim because whole
milk has too much fat, too many calories, and cholesterol that can give you heart disease. Right?
In case you've been led to believe
these lies, I've got a few things I'd like you to know about the darling of the dairy industry, skim milk.
1. It was designed for profit,
not to make you healthy
This might remind you of the fiber deal mentioned earlier
People haven't always bought into the idea that fat
is unhealthy. It all started with a flawed theory by a really bad scientist who said that saturated fat and cholesterol cause heart
disease. Which is pretty weird, considering few people had heart attacks around the turn of the century compared to today when everyone
was still eating pounds of butter and cream every week? Good old Anzel Keyes and his lipid hypothesis lives on.
Somehow, a decade or
so after World War II we were all slowly beginning to be convinced that fat was the enemy. Butter was replaced with cheap margarine
made from toxic industrial oils, and creamy, full-fat milk was being dumped by many in favor of skim or low fat.
Dairy manufacturers
were thrilled with this new trend, however, because what was once an industrial waste product had quickly become a highly-desirable
health food. When cream was skimmed from milk, the remaining fat-free milk used to be considered a nearly useless byproduct of obtaining
the cream. But, market that wasteful skim milk as being a healthful choice for consumers, and suddenly, you've got a serious money-maker
on your hands! Now, the agri-business giants running the dairy industry are able to profit off of both products, and don't intend
on stopping anytime soon.
2. It has a mystery ingredient they're not telling you about
Before processing, skim milk has a very unappetizing bluish color, a chalky
taste, and watery texture that does not even resemble natural milk at all. So, to whiten, thicken, and make it taste a little more
normal, powdered milk solids are often mixed into the milk, if you want to call it milk.
Whats so bad about powdered milk? Well, in
the manufacturing process, liquid milk is forced through tiny holes at very high pressure, which causes the cholesterol in the milk
to oxidize, and toxic nitrates to form. Oxidized cholesterol contributes to the buildup of plaque in the arteries, while un-oxidized
cholesterol from unprocessed foods is actually an antioxidant to help fight inflammation in the body. The proteins found in powdered
milk are so denatured that they are unrecognizable by the body and contribute to inflammation. American sure seems to have a lot of
inflammation these days.
Shockingly, dairy manufacturers are not required by the FDA to label the powdered milk as a separate ingredient,
because it's still technically just milk, the single ingredient found on the list. So, there is no way to be sure that it is or isn't
in your fat-free or low-fat dairy products.
3. It contains antibiotics, nasty bodily fluids, and GMOs (Genetically Modified Organisms)
The skim milk you'll find in most grocery
stores is a mass-produced product from animals in CAFO's (concentrated animal feeding operations), or factory farms, where the cows
are kept in confinement and fed a diet that is completely inappropriate for their species. Because cows are designed to eat grass,
when they are fed a diet consisting primarily of corn, GMO of course, as they are in factory farms, they get sick.
And because they
get sick, they're typically given antibiotics to keep them alive so they can continue to produce. But because they're still fighting
off infections, things like blood and pus from open sores frequently make their way into the finished product the milk we see on
store shelves. The FDA allows up to 750 million pus cells per liter of milk, to be sold legally.
Also legal, are the injections of
recombinant bovine growth hormones, or rBGH, as you read about in (section 4 ) a known carcinogen banned in virtually every industrialized
nation in the world, except the United States. You're trusted bought and paid for FDA protecting you.
The recombinant part
of the growth hormone means that it was genetically modified from the cows natural growth hormones to stimulate increased milk production.
4. It provides almost no nutritional value.
Real milk really does do a body good. It has many valuable nutrients in it. In addition
to vital minerals like calcium, milk provides vitamins D, A, E, and K.
Well, skim milk actually has no vitamin K because it's concentrated
in the butterfat of the milk. And as for the others, they are fat-soluble vitamins. So even if you were to get a little bit of them
in from drinking your fat-free milk, you won't actually be able to absorb and assimilate them into your body.
Unless maybe you pored
yourself a glass of skim with a nice heaping spread of butter (not margarine) over toast or whatever.
But, if you're not getting milk
from a farm that raises cows on green pastures instead of in concentrated animal-feeding factories, your milk won't have very much
of those essential fat-soluble vitamins. Cows get their vitamin E, A, and K from the nutrients they eat in grass, and vitamin D from
cruising around in the sunlight all day. Also, because confinement dairy cows are bred for unnaturally-high levels of milk production,
the vitamin content of the milk is severely diluted, as the cow only transfers a set amount of vitamins to her milk supply.
As for
the rest of the nutrition in skim milk from factory farms? Well, it does provide a bit of denatured (and therefore, potentially quite
harmful) protein, thanks to high-heat pasteurization. But no beneficial enzymes and probiotic microflora those are all killed off
in the pasteurization process which aid indigestion.
And then of course, some chemically-synthesized vitamin D is usually added since
confinement cows are severely lacking in it. Except for the kind that humans and animals are able to assimilate from exposure to the
sun, vitamin D3, isn't at all the same as the manufactured D they dump into skim milk synthetic vitamin D2. A study referenced by
the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition concluded that synthetic vitamin D2 should no longer be regarded as a nutrient appropriate
for supplementation or fortification of foods, because of how basically worthless it is to your body.
5. It won't make or keep you skinny
Farmers knew well before skim milk was marketed as a waistline-slimming health food what it really
is good for fattening you up! Skim milk has traditionally been fed to pigs to help them bulk up for slaughter. They of course would
save the good part, the cream, for human consumption.
Today, our school children who have been guinea pigs of the misguided nutritional
advice to drink fat-free milk instead of whole milk certainly aren't any thinner for it. Researchers at the Harvard medical school
found that, contrary to their hypothesis, skim and 1% milk were associated with weight gain, but dairy fat was not, in a study in
which thousands of childrens milk drinking habits were surveyed.
Adults aren't faring much better with swapping whole milk for skim.
Studies have showed time and time again that a reduced-fat diet, similarly to a reduced-calorie diet, does not result in long-term
weight loss and health, but instead leads only to transient weight loss that would be weight that comes piling right back on after
it's temporarily shed. This is because healthy fats actually curb your appetite and trigger the production of hormones which tell
the brain when you're full. If you're not eating fat, you stay constantly hungry, and wind up binging on unhealthy food. Fat-free
milk essentially signals to your body that something is missing, which leads to overeating and weight gain.
6. It won't help you avoid heart disease
Fat-free milk is supposed to be heart healthy because it lacks the saturated fat and cholesterol
that whole milk contains.
It really boggles my mind how prevalent the completely de-bunked theory still is that heart disease is caused
by the intake of saturated fat. One guy makes up a totally bogus scientific study that points to countries with a high-fat diet
having high rates of heart disease, while leaving out all the countries of people eating tons of fat and having almost zero heart
disease. And somehow, almost seventy years later, we're still singing his praises and demonizing saturated fat and cholesterol? The
good old lipid hypothesis as mentioned in (section 2) lives on while Americans are fatter and sicker than ever in history trying to
stay alive on prescription drugs. There's a lot of money in drugs. Billions.
Think about it. Were our ancestors eating fat-free sour
cream, cholesterol-free buttery spreads or skim milk? Hell no. Dairy had always been consumed in its whole, full-fat form before
the industrialization of foods began. And no one had heart disease like today not even close. The field of medical cardiology didn't
even exist until the advent of industrial seed oils packed with toxic polyunsaturated fat.
When you look at basic history, or even
modern trends of disease in the last half century, as intake of foods high in saturated fat and cholesterol have decreased, heart
disease has been steadily skyrocketing. So, why is this myth that saturated fat and cholesterol are causing it still being perpetuated?
It doesn't make any logical sense.
Could it be because over 1/3 of the adult population is taking expensive statin medications that
make players in the medical and pharmaceutical industries a whole lot of money? Or that the processed food industry doesn't want you
to know just how much more they profit off of foods produced with cheap, shelf-stable industrial oils, as opposed to real, saturated
fat?
Heart disease is in no way caused by dietary cholesterol and saturated fat. It just isn't. Even heart surgeons are starting to
speak out on the fact that the science that saturated fat alone causes heart disease is non-existent. Do we really need more proof
other than empirical evidence? Look around - For a major developed country, Americans are the most over-weight and obese on the planet,
and the sickest.
Better late than never? Article
An article in Todays Dietitian, the magazine published by the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics,
explained that the saturated fat found in dairy may actually be health promoting, and that the message to drink low-fat milk products
is inaccurate. There are hundreds of compounds in milk fat, such as distinct fatty acids and fat-soluble vitamins that play a role
in supporting our health. For example, trans-palmitoleic acid, a fatty acid found in full fat milk, cheese, yogurt, and butter, may
substantially reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes and other metabolic disorders. Other research has found that people with the highest
levels of milk fat biomarkers in their blood, suggesting they consumed the most dairy fat, were actually at a much lower risk of heart
attack.
Apparently, no one seems to be able to make up their mind on anything with regards to food. Are we Guinea Pigs until we die
or are there pills available or a medical procedure to protect us from all the garbage we've been told we must eat as a healthy diet?
A little ridiculous to think the above article made it big time in the news.