There is big money in global warming or so called climate change. The people who are profiting big time are those pushing this nonsense
about saving the planet by installing solar systems, wind generators, purchasing a battery or hybrid car etc.
It most often seems
that those that scream the loudest about saving the planet are those that apparently don't really buy into this idea or simply don't
want to participate for some reason. The alledged father of the great global warming idea, Mr. Al Gore apparently still flies
a private jet around the country that uses more fuel, putting more of that life sustaining CO2 into the atmosphere in a couple hours
than what the average person puts into the atmosphere in a year driving a typical car.
With the technology today, we can
use satellite imageing to hover over where all the wealthy, pollywood elite and polticians live. Don't seem to see many
solar systems or wind generators. Barbara Streisand has a mansion on the coast with undoubtedly plenty of wind. Apparently, her mansion
is on about five acres. Plenty of room for at least one or two small wind generators. Where are they? We can see what looks
like a small patch of solar panels less than what a typical small house might have, and perhaps would handle lighting in the
servants quarters? Too unsightly to have solar panels or a wind generator Barbara? I saw another photo of her mansion with a
couple of gas gussling suv's parked in front of the house. It seems that she's always talking about saving the planet from this climate
change BS.
Good old Al Gore. Many years ago, Mr. Gore was badgered by a reporter about driving a big gas gussling vehicle to the airport to climb aboard
his private jet. He apparently quickly bought a little Prius to improve his image? I'll bet he took that tax credit too. He
left the white house with apparently a net worth of about one million dollars. His net worth now is estimated to be between
one and two hundred million dollars. He seems to have done quite well with this global warming / change business.
He
might become the first global warming billionaire.
An article by Drew Johnson
Gores hypocritical home energy use and do as I
say not as I do lifestyle has plunged to embarrassing new depths.
In just this past year, Gore burned through enough energy to power the typical American household for more than 21 years, according
to a new report by the National Center for Public Policy Research. The former vice president consumed 230,889 kilowatt hours (kWh)
at his Nashville residence, which includes his home, pool and driveway entry gate. A typical family uses an average of 10,812 kWh
of electricity per year, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.
It gets worse.
Last September alone, Gore devoured
30,993 kWh of electricity. Thats enough to power 34 average American homes for a month. Over the last 12 months, Gore used more electricity
just heating his outdoor swimming pool than six typical homes use in a year.
He certainly does not live by the principles he advocates for
the little people.
It didn't get warmer, so now it's climate change. The climate has been changing since the beginning of time.
Scientists said at the
turn into the 20th century, that we were going into a new ice age. A few years later, we were going to burn up. Then it was back to
another ice age again.
To think that humans can change the climate of the planet by buying solar panels, wind generators and
little cars is beyond ludicrous. They all use more energy in the manufactureing, and cause more polution, but billions
are made by those in the business of supplying them. The tax payers get to subsidize these big corporations to the tune of billions
of dollars, then unbelievable numbers of them go belly up. It has already cost the American people billions of dollars in this
giant scam.
Very few people have purchased hybid vehicles, and most that have only did so because of the tax credit. Our
governments lost revenue is of course picked up by the tax payers or likely barrowed to ad to the unbelievable existing nation
debt and the billions of annual tax dollars on it's maintenance. These cars of course cost more to build with all the extra goodies
like motors and batteries etc. These extra goodies directly represent an expenditure of real energy that few consider deducting from
what they saved on fuel for a more accurate savings amount. Then of course there's the inevitable battery
replacement cost?
The number of bankrupt solar energy companies is hard to believe. Apparently few, including the most often democratic left wing
politicians and the left wing media want the general public to know much about this. Generally all we hear about is one or two huge
corporations, maybe. The list of solar companies going out of business or fileing for bankruptcy is staggering. The tax
payers have been looseing billions , yet we continue to hear about saving the planet and subsidizing these giant failing corporations.
Click here for list of solar companies out of business or bankrupt Remember to click back.
This list is of only 74 major solar companies from 2010 to 2013. They're still fileing bankruptcy today like no tomorrow. Very
big loses for the American tax payers. I sure wouldn't want to have a solar system on my roof and have the company that installed
it go bankrupt. Then again, I wouldn't have one in the first place.
There is NO free lunch. Never
Things to think about
Every
dollar earned directly represents an expenditure of energy, 100%
Every dollar spent directly represents an expenditure of energy,
100%
Considering the public utilities throughout the country, has anyone noticed any of them closing down offices or laying off
any employees?
A short common sense video on Global warming or "climat change" below, perhaps one of the biggest money making
scams in history - 36 minutes worth watching
A fun solution to this great global warming - climate change idea
If we took all the people in the country that truely
believe in climate change and believes it's not natural and caused be humans, and can be corrected by humans, here's the deal.
Let's
say about 40% of the population really believes the climate can be changed by human intervention. With a population presently of about
325,000,000 people not including illegals of course, this would be 130,000,000 people.
Let's assume this group would be enough
to save the planet if they all used alternative energy sources.
Here's the deal. On the next income tax form, the tax payer checks
a little box stating whether or not they really believe in global warming / climate change, and they believe it can be corrected
by human intervention, with a clear statement that if they do, they must do their part in correcting the problem. Any house
they live in over 1000 Sq. Ft., they must install a government approved solar system properly sized for their home before the
next income tax period, or a government approved wind generating system also approved for proper size. If they drive an suv, they
will trade it for a little prius or other suitable planet saving vehicle. If they don't do these things, they will pay a healthy tax
penalty for failing to do so. We can be sure our bright lawyer politicians in Washington can come up with a proper penalty.
The penalty could be for example, for the amount people are told they will save by going solar, or the purchase of a hybrid
or battery operated car.
Also, there new planet saving solar or wind system would no-long be subsidized by the tax payers.
After
all, why should it be if it's a profitable situation?
I can't help wondering how many are going to check that little box on their
tax form? The wealthy, particularly in polywood surely can easily afford panels all over the roof of their mansion. But if they don't
want those unsightly panels on their roof, which apparently they don't, then think of the money that could be collected in tax penalties.
$$
Also, all who continue to fly around the country in a private jet rather than dividing up that CO2 going into the atmosphere
among two or three hundred passingers in a commercial airliner would pay a healthy penalty perhaps based on the amount of fuel used
annually.
Anyone who doesn't check that little box, we won't have to listen to them ever again. Wouldn't that be great?
It could be
a win win situation for everybody.