Don't Fall for Appeals to Scientific or Clinical Research when Fraudulent Scientific Research today is So Rampant.
Don't ever believe it when you are told by anyone involved with the Western Medical Establishment that their products or anything is based on sound, valid, scientific, clinical evidence. Fraudulent scientific research is so widespread you can't know anything for sure. Maybe you have to use Western Medicine, or maybe you don't, but don't go in blindly believing everything you're told.
Most Western Scientific Medical Research is Fraudulent - An interesting article from the Waking Times
Insiders & experts say that
most medical reasearch is a fraud.
Fraudulent scientific research is rife throughout the world due to the power of monetary influence wielded by Big Pharma, the giant cartel of multinational pharmaceutical corporations started over 100 years ago by the Rockefellers. This fraudulent scientific research is now so widespread and pervasive it has become an open secret. There is a long list of medical journal editors, doctors and professors on the outside, former Big Pharma employees and executives on the inside, as well as government officials somewhere in between, who have stepped forward as whistleblowers and acknowledged the fraud. Money buys favorable research. Period This is not really surprising, given the history of Rockefeller Western medicine and the fact that Big Pharma's business model is based on managing disease, treating symptoms and keeping patients on the drug hamster wheel, rather than actually curing them.
Everyone Knows How the Game Works
Whistleblower Dr. Peter
Rost, former vice president of Pfizer, a giant Big Pharma company, spelled it out. In the video clip embedded below, taken
from the documentary One More Girl, he reveals that everyone knows how the game works:
Universities, health
organizations, everybody that I have encountered are out there . begging for money. (Big Pharma corporations) use that money
to basically buy influence (Big Pharma provides) grants for various kinds of research make sure they (scientific researchers)
became beholden Everyone obviously knows this is how things work.
They (scientific researchers) are not going to continue to get
money unless they're saying what you (i.e. Big Pharma) want them to say.
They know it, you know it, and it's only maybe
the public that doesn't know it.
In this way, almost the entire medical scientific community has been compromised and has
become thoroughly untrustworthy.
Fraudulent Scientific Research Exposed by Medical Journal Editors and Professors
Look at what numerous key experts are saying about
this epidemic of fraudulent scientific research. Dr. Richard Horton is the current editor-in-chief of the British
Lancet journal, which is respected as one of the best peer-reviewed medical journals in the world. He came out and stated:
The
case against science is straightforward: Much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted
by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with
an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness.
Then look at what Marcia
Angell, former editor-in-chief of the esteemed New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), had to say about the pervasivefraudulent scientific research:
It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to
rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which
I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.
Dr. John P.A. Ioannidis,
a professor of disease prevention at Stanford University, published a study in a PLoS One paper entitled Why Most Published Research Findings Are False. He found that research conclusions are less likely to be true
when study samples sizes are too small, when effect sizes are even smaller, and when there are major variances in study designs, definitions,
outcomes and analytical modes. He highlighted the corrupting influence of Big Pharma and concluded that:
There is increasing
concern that most current published research findings are false. It is more likely for a research claim to be false than true.
Fraudulent Scientific Research Exposed by Other Big Pharma Whistleblowers
Fraudulent scientific research has also been exposed by former
executives and employees of the Big Pharma machine. In addition to Dr. Peter Rost, another Big Pharma whistleblower include Dr.
John Virapen, author of Side Effects: Death. Confessions of a Pharma-Insider, who admits in this book that he bribed a
Swedish professor to enhance the registration of Prozac in Sweden. Virapen worked for 35 years in the pharmaceutical industry
internationally (most notably as general manager of Eli Lilly and Company in Sweden) where he was responsible for the marketing
of several Big Pharma drugs (all of them with side effects). He exposes how Big Pharma invests more than USD $50,000 per physician
per year to entice them to prescribe their products, how more than 75% of leading scientists in the field of medicine
are paid for, and how illnesses are invented by the pharmaceutical industry to increase profit.
Another Big
Pharma whistleblower is Gwen Olsen, a former Big Pharma sales rep who really knew how to push for a hard sell. She reveals
the underhanded tactics she was taught by Big Pharma executives to ensure doctors were prescribing their drugs. After her niece
killed herself while taking antidepressants, she changed her tune and exposed the tactics. Olsen admits that she used bribery and
personal connections to sell Big Pharma meds, because she found it very difficult to sell drugs on their own merit, that the true
purpose of pharmaceutical drugs is social control, that Big Pharma buys up real cures to disease, or sues companies not
to release genuine cures. She also reveals how drug effects or side effects were often separated to avoid full disclosure, e.g.
if the effect was on the CNS (Central Nervous System) then Big Pharma would break it down to say dizziness, fatigue, etc. so effects
would look smaller.
Sadly, patients were harmed or killed due to Olsens (and other drugs reps like her) intentional side stepping/misinforming
physicians about a drug's effects. Olsen refers to the Revolving Door Syndrome, meaning patients who are hospitalized continue to
come back repeatedly, and each time lose more of their bodily functions. The drugs were brain damaging, could induce violence and
were slowly killing them. Meanwhile, many drugs are found to be not more efficacious than a sugar pill (placebo).
Fraudulent Scientific Research Exposed by Governmental Whistleblower Too
Lastly, it is also useful to note that fraudulent scientific
research has been acknowledged by governmental officials too. Dr. William Thompson of the CDC (the US Center for Disease Control)
made headlines last year when he bravely came forth to publicly admit that he had cooked the books and fudged the data regarding vaccines.
Here is an excerpt of his public statement from August 27th, 2014:
My name is William Thompson. I am a Senior Scientist with the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention, where I have worked since 1998.
I regret that my coauthors and I omitted statistically significant
information in our 2004 article published in the journal Pediatrics. The omitted data suggested that African American males who received
the MMR vaccine before age 36 months were at increased risk for autism. Decisions were made regarding which findings to report after
the data were collected, and I believe that the final study protocol was not followed.
It is difficult to estimate the prevalence of fraud and deceit in the medical literature directly, but an indirect insight can be gained from questionnaire surveys. One North American study reported that 36% of doctoral and post-doctoral students were aware of an instance of scientific misconduct; furthermore, 15% were willing to do whatever was necessary to get a grant or publish a paper.3 Another survey of Biostatistician members of International Society for Clinical Biostatistics, who may be thought of as unbiased and in a prime position to observe fraud and deceit, revealed that 51% of respondents knew of fraudulent projects. Different forms of fraud such as fabrication and falsification of data, deceptive reporting of results, suppression of data, and deceptive design or analysis had been observed in fairly similar numbers.4 This evidence fairly convincingly debunks the idea that fraud or deceit in medical research is a relatively minor and isolated activity. It is indeed widespread.
NOTE: Has anyone noticed how many people today, particularly in the 60's and older age group that are on prescription drugs most often until death. Has anyone noticed that many if not most seem to get sicker and sicker requiring more drugs?$ These drugs apparently don't CURE anything. They simply treat the symptoms until you die.$ This is a way to live out your final years?