It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted
physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over
my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal Of Medicine.
Dr. Marcia Angell, a physician and longtime Editor-in-Chief
of the journal.
The following is from the Savage Plain website, "Exploring reality first hand"
To blindly trust a medical
professional (from any training discipline) is to relinquish responsibility for your health and possibly your life. This decision
is purely based on the assumption that said professionals know what they are doing and endeavor to work in your best interests.
The
bedrock of this lofty position of godlike knowledge and understanding is the Peer Review Process, which is sold to us as the pinnacle
of scholarly fact checking. In reality its nothing more than jobs for the boys or as Ken Wheeler puts it
"peer review means you
kiss a bunch of ass-holes of people above you, you agree with their crap. And all those people did, was agree with crap before them.
Its a giant circle jerk of stupidity, ignorance and hubris
Corporate - Junk - Science (article)
Science has been hijacked by corporate junk science, which pretends to be real science
but is actually highly fraudulent.
Corporate junk science is an all-pervading presence in our society. Its everywhere. The scientific
journals of the entire world, offline and online, have been flooded with so much fake science that it has, sad to say, become practically
impossible for the average person to wade through all of it and sort out the wheat from the chaff. However, the fake science I am
referring to here is not unintentional or sloppy work, which is more of a minor problem in the scheme of things (since it will eventually
be corrected with due diligence), but rather the deliberately fraudulent scientific studies which are put out by major corporations
with a definite agenda in mind usually establishing a fake scientific basis of safety for their products, whether they be vaccines,
mobile phones, GMOs, tobacco, fluoride, soda or soft drinks, etc.
Its nothing more than corporate junk science, and many people,
including doctors, scientists and academics, have been taken in hook, line and sinker by it.
Its time to shine the light on this ugly
phenomenon. Science is meant to be about the pursuit of truth and understanding how our world works. It is truly sickening to see
the extent to which it has been hijacked to serve corporate interests to make a tiny, tiny 0.0001% rich at the expense of harming
and killing the rest of mankind.
A recent study published on JAMA entitled Research Misconduct Identified by the US Food and Drug Administration
found some very disturbing things in its sample of 57 studies that it analyzed:
Fifty-seven published clinical trials were identified
for which an FDA inspection of a trial site had found significant evidence of 1 or more of the following problems: falsification or
submission of false information, 22 trials (39%); problems with adverse events reporting, 14 trials (25%); protocol violations, 42
trials (74%); inadequate or inaccurate recordkeeping, 35 trials (61%); failure to protect the safety of patients and/or issues with
oversight or informed consent, 30 trials (53%); and violations not otherwise categorized, 20 trials (35%).
Take a look at this
first finding. It states that 39% which is around 2/5 of studies committed data falsification! How can we possibly trust medical science
when the fraud is so blatant and widespread? And its not as though the authors of these studies come out and admit it. The study
also found that:
Only 3 of the 78 publications (4%) that resulted from trials in which the FDA found significant violations mentioned
the objectionable conditions or practices found during the inspection. No corrections, retractions, expressions of concern, or other
comments acknowledging the key issues identified by the inspection were subsequently published.
Another study at PLOS ONE entitled
How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data concluded that:
It is likely
that, if on average 2% of scientists admit to have falsified research at least once and up to 34% admit other questionable research
practices, the actual frequencies of misconduct could be higher than this.
In light of all of this, if we want the truth, we need to
look at the whole structure of how science works in the real world. We need to get wise to the methods that are used by unscrupulous
groups to further their agenda. $
$ - Most science today is about politics, money, control and dependency - $